Who would be the better player's? American Footballers without their Padding & helmets, or Rugby Players? - rugby players that were helmets
together to play football or rugby
Thursday, February 11, 2010
Rugby Players That Were Helmets Who Would Be The Better Player's? American Footballers Without Their Padding & Helmets, Or Rugby Players?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
Rugby players that are injured are not afraid.
American can be large and bulky, but not as a rugby player to be successful.
Just my opinion.
(I'm American)
The players, no question. Rugby pitches are very hard, no doubt, but NFL players are huge. You should see the size and muscle in some of these lines. Sorry, but you decide for rugby players and children who had a toy, even if the rugby boys were very fiesty yet had no luck. Perhaps against the quarterbacks and kickers, could win, but not against the majors in the line of what () to be even faster.
As an American, I must say that rugby players kick @ ss.
I think that football players could have on Australian rugby and soccer players at the same time, and all its kick @ small businesses.
I think you should give helmet football player, filling and then see who is better
What have they done something like this before. Rugby Union v. Rugby League.
This means that both codes have similar properties, but different and challenging role of competencies and standards that they play. I do not know why people compare to.
If you change this and ask for the football players of the Union be as good, if they got their helmets on the same answer. Various sports and other physical demands on players. A total of two sports very hard.
Post a Comment